A new study from Stanford University uncovers a critical flaw in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), a popular AI technique designed to enhance chatbot accuracy by pulling in real-world data. Legal applications of AI—a sector increasingly reliant on RAG—are particularly susceptible to “hallucinations,” or fabrications of legal precedents and statutes that do not exist. These errors can mislead legal professionals, undermine trust in AI tools, and even compromise cases. The findings highlight the urgent need for better safeguards in AI-driven legal research. Read the whole story here: https://dho.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/Legal_RAG_Hallucinations.pdf.
Realistic and AGI Hallucinations: Legal
by Tim Cortinovis | Sunday, 16. March, 2025 | Originals | 0 comments
